Rejected posting to BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU (fwd)

[Tox]

Umm, sorry to bother y'all, but could the relevant mighty one fix this?
wjh is phasing out isr; must one unsubscribe and resubscribe, or could it
be otherwise repaired?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 1995 19:53:13 -0400
From: L-Soft list server at St. Peter's College, US (1.8b) <LISTSERV at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
To: tox at WJH.HARVARD.EDU
Subject: Rejected posting to BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU

You  are   not  authorized  to   send  mail  to   the  BOC-L  list   from  your
tox at WJH.HARVARD.EDU account. You  might be authorized to send to  the list from
another of  your accounts,  or perhaps  when using  another mail  program which
generates slightly  different addresses, but  LISTSERV has no way  to associate
this other account or address with yours. If you need assistance or if you have
any question  regarding the policy of  the BOC-L list, please  contact the list
owners: BOC-L-Request at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU.

------------------------ Rejected message (26 lines) --------------------------
Received: from wjh.harvard.edu (wjh.harvard.edu [128.103.8.10]) by listserv.spc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA29152 for <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 19:53:11 -0400
Received: (from tox at localhost) by wjh.harvard.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA10504; Sat, 26 Aug 1995 19:53:57 -0400
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 1995 19:53:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tox <tox at wjh.harvard.edu>
To: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Subject: Re: The Face
In-Reply-To: <199508261739.SAA07307 at earth.ftech.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950826194757.10471A-100000 at wjh.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



On Sat, 26 Aug 1995, Norman Beresford wrote:
[quoting some impaired creature whose shite he read]
>
> Hawkwind:    "Perennially-touring crusty outfit with cider-swigging,
> soap-avoiding following.  Terrible album covers.  Baffling continual success
> in inverse proportion to genuine talent"
>
Well, considering that their monetary success relative to, say, Michael
Jackson or the New Kids on the Block has been negligible, I guess it must
truly be "in inverse proportion to genuine talent".

-Tox