Off: Waters sucks, Floyd better without him!

[Jon Browne]

In message <199606190955.KAA04146 at neptune.shef.ac.uk>, Chris Bates
<C.D.Bates at SHEFFIELD.AC.UK> writes
>> 3 brilliant albums (Pro's and Cons of Hitchhiking, Radio Kaos, Amused
>> To Death) although not neccesarily 'better' than his work with Pink Floyd
>
>No, stop. you're killing me. Brilliant? Ha! They wouldn't have even had
>a release if he'd not made a name for himself in the Floyd.

In other words, if he hadn't have led one of the greatest bands of all
time for 12-14 years, he would have found it difficult to get a deal?
>
>> Likewise the rest of Pink
>> Floyd improved probably because they had to get creative again.

Yeah right, Lapse of Reason really pisses on any Floyd *with* Waters!
>
>And of course they didn't have the ego of La Roger to overcome. Look
>how long it took Wright, surely the most musically gifted, to play again
>after Roger ruined his self-confidence.

How did he do that? I don't know any of this.


Irrespective of any personality problems, *surely* Waters is viewed as
the most important member of the Floyd?
>
>
>Chris

--
Jon Browne