Bootleg CD removal from Codex proposed

[Kevin Sommers]

>Kevin Sommers writes:
>
>> >Undecided
>> >---------
>> >Damnation Alley (Minneapolis 89 CD boot)
>> >Theta Orionis (CD boot)
>>
>> I'm a bit biased, maybe (probably.........OK, definitely!), but I'd have
to
>> say I agree.  I do think 'Theta Orionis' should be included, but why is
>> 'Damnation Alley' "Undecided"?  I had always assumed that was a very
small
>> run (~5).
>
>
>Damnation Alley should definitely be out!
>I'm not convinced that Theta Orionis should stay in either.   I agree
>that this is about the only one I've ever seen available at record fairs
>but surely it is in exactly the same category as all the other bootlegs
>and giving this credence in the Codex simply by sure wieght of numbers
>when we are excluding others of identical type doesn't really seem to
>justfy its inclusion.    I vote against it - if only on grounds of
>consistency.
>
>jill


My thinking on 'Theta Orionis' is that it's a "proper" CD, as opposed to a
CD-R; I think that's where the line should be drawn.

Kevin Sommers

primiti too taa, nnz kkr muu

http://www.psn.net/~novadrive/