Fw: Re: HW: Hawkwind Remix Project

bedroom trancer colm1 at MINISTRYOFSOUND.NET
Mon Jan 15 18:36:30 EST 2001


yeah but is it exactlly the same as the bass ritual album??
As in has it the same tracks, mixes etc??


colm

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ANDREW GARIBALDI <andygee at DIAL.PIPEX.COM>
>To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
>Date: 15 January 2001 19:26
>Subject: Re: HW: Hawkwind Remix Project
>
>
>>Sadly this is one of those cases where I am unable to tell the full story,
>>as it stands, behind this CD as it will incriminate far too many people -
>>all I can say is be glad you have it, even if you don't have all of it -
>oh,
>>and it is the 'Bass Ritual' album for which I reviewed the FULL version
>ages
>>back in one of the old CD Services catalogues, OK.
>>Andy Garibaldi.
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "David Bottomley" <merlinas at DIRCON.CO.UK>
>>To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
>>Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 11:20 AM
>>Subject: Re: HW: Hawkwind Remix Project
>>
>>
>>> >So what is this item exactly? Tape? CDR?
>>> >
>>> >FoFP
>>>
>>>
>>> It's a CD (not CD-R) with (as Arin said) no details other than track
>>listing
>>> on the reverse of the silvery, single-sided insert (double-headed hawk
>>logo
>>> on the front) & a thanks to one Trevor Long. And it has a catalogue
>number
>>> (WARLORD777CD). Andy G has this item (well, one with the same track
>>listing
>>> and his descriptions match the music on my CD, so it must be the same
>>item)
>>> as "Bass Ritual - The Remixes" in the most recent CDS psychedelic/space
>>rock
>>> supplement (7). Whether it's the same cover or not, I don't know. I
>picked
>>> my copy up from the Voiceprint stall at Brixton. I assumed that they
>>> (Voiceprint? Hawkwind?) had planned to give it a full release under the
>>Bass
>>> Ritual name, but for whatever reason changed their mind and gave us this
>>> (limited?) version in place. Just guesswork. Andy G? Any idea what the
>>story
>>> is?
>>>
>>> BTW, it's well worth getting hold of. Better (or at least less variable)
>>> than Future Reconstructions.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>
>



More information about the boc-l mailing list