OFF: Rush - the people's choice

[Cyberkrel]

Agree about Floyd - surely I can't be the only one who thinks DSOTM these
days sounds lifeless and plodding. I think that's why I got so much out of
the three Pink Floyd tribute CD's - classic songs given whole new leases of
life by modern artsists who keep faithful to the feel and structure of the
originals - I listen to these more than I listen to Floyd!!
As to the Hawks, most albums still sound surprisingly contemporary.
Andy G.
----- Original Message -----
From: HawkFan <hawkfan at RATSAUCE.CO.UK>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: OFF: Rush - the people's choice


> That's a little unkind.
>
> If by Rush you mean the Caress of Steel, Farewell to Kings, 2112 era then
> the albums are great albums, but sadly ideal only for teenage males. As a
> teenage (43teen) male I still love them :-)
>
> Actually a lot of the albums I loved as a teenage male now sound
> embarrassingly juvenile. Still love them though :-)
>
> Having said that, Hawkwind (desparate attempt to get back on topic) has
aged
> remarkably well. Rather better than such luminaries as Pink Floyd.
>
> JR
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: BOC/Hawkwind Discussion List
> [mailto:BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET]On Behalf Of RMayo19761 at AOL.COM
> Sent: 10 August 2004 17:25
> To: BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET
> Subject: Re: OFF: Rush - the people's choice
>
>
> Rush is the favorite band of IT pros?
> no surprise there
> --unless you're the pissy snob who wrote that story
> bobm