The Wrong Number of The Beast

[Ian Abrahams]

The old jokes are still, well, the oldest ... aren't they!

----- Original Message -----
From: "MikeMontfort" <mikemont at NYCAP.RR.COM>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: The Wrong Number of The Beast


> Ah beat me to it Ian
>
> Ian Abrahams wrote:
>
> >What about 667 - is that still the neighbour of the beast?
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "M Holmes" <fofp at HOLYROOD.ED.AC.UK>
> >To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
> >Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:49 PM
> >Subject: The Wrong Number of The Beast
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Looks like Heavy Metal got it wrong:
> >>
> >>http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=634679
> >>
> >>Executive Summary: 616 is the Number of The Beast. Previous Numbers of
> >>The Beast should be disregarded as invalid, if not heresy.
> >>
> >>FoFP
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> No trees were harmed in the production of this e-mail; however, a huge
number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
>
> Floyd Code
> v1.2a r BO* 1/0/@ tG 0- 0 UG 5 51 65.5% <29mar5>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.1
> GB/L/MU d+(++) s: a+ C++(+++)$ !UC--- P+>$ L E? W+++$ N(++) o K- w+$>++ !O
!M- V PS+(++) PE Y+ PGP- t+ 5++ X- R tv+ b+++(++++) DI++ D+ G e++(++++)
h---- r+++ z++++
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>