OFF: The Weller/Kilmister controversy

Ulf Hamr lindas1 at ADELPHIA.NET
Thu Nov 30 06:12:00 EST 2006


Agreed, The Jam, were probably one of the best bands to come out of that era, to call them rubbish, is almost as daft as saying the Beatles sucked. 
Cheers Stephe
 
> Hmmm...
> Whatever Paul Wellers faults, dismissing his work out of hand is just crass.  The best of The Jam stands up well against anything else of its era, and as for the current crop of guitar bands, more of them sound like XTC wannabes or bad Joy Division copyists than sound like Jam tribute acts.  There are plenty of Lemmy afficionados out there too.  If you're going to kvetch about dreck, just consider the vile trash that's being squeezed out of Cowell's & Walsh's toothpaste tubes - they make the old SAW stable look like great artists!
> 
> Cheers
> ChrisW
> (stumbling off back into the swamp, mumbling...)
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Date:    Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:03:23 +0000
> From:    Roger <roger.wynne-jones at VIRGIN.NET>
> Subject: Re: OFF: Lemmy in Cambridge newspaper
> 
> You cannot be Serious!
> I enjoy listening to All Mod Cons, have it on vinyl and CD, good version 
> of "David Watts" done originally by The Kinks?
> and Setting Sons aint bad either, certainly not rubbish, have a listen
> 
> cheers
> Roger
> 
> Keith Henderson wrote:
> >   Jon notes...
> >    
> >   http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/lifestyle/arts_music/news/2005/11/17/e2127bfc-3f67-4547-b98f-170ade42235b.lpf
> >
> > Who the f*ck is Paul Weller?  Never heard of him...or this band "the Jam."
> >    
> >   Seriously.
> >    
> >   80's new wave rubbish, I gather?
> >    
> >   Grakkl
> >
> ------------------------------
> 
> Date:    Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:19:07 +0000
> From:    Tim Hall <tim at KALYR.COM>
> Subject: Re: OFF: Lemmy in Cambridge newspaper
> 
> Keith Henderson wrote:
> 
> > 80's new wave rubbish, I gather?
> 
> Today's mainstream music scene would be rather better if Lemmy had a 
> rather greater influence, and the much overrated Paul Weller had rather 
> less.
> 
> Just about every overhyped new band sounds like a dodgy Jam tribute band.
> 
> ------------------------------
> This e-mail is intended for the named recipient(s).  It and any attachments may contain privileged and/or confidential information. They may not be disclosed to or used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient.  If you are not one of the intended recipients, or this email is received in error, please immediately either notify the sender or contact OAG Worldwide Limited on +44 (0) 1582 600111 quoting the name of the sender and the email address to which it has been sent and then delete it and any attachment(s). 
> While all reasonable efforts are made to safeguard inbound and outbound e-mails, OAG Worldwide Limited and its affiliate companies cannot guarantee that attachments do not contain any viruses or are compatible with your systems, and does not accept liability in respect of viruses or computer problems experienced. Neither OAG Worldwide Limited nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments.  
> OAG Worldwide Limited may monitor or record outgoing and incoming e-mail to secure effective system operation and for other lawful purposes.  By replying to this email you give your consent to such monitoring. 
> Thank you.
> OAG Worldwide Limited is a company registered in England and Wales (registered number 4226716), with its registered office at Church Street, Dunstable, Bedfordshire, LU5 4HB, United Kingdom.



More information about the boc-l mailing list