(OFF) Re: WOTEOT master tapes (was Re: Jamun & Spacerocktrading intro)

lucidsound lucidsound at IC24.NET
Thu Mar 10 15:38:32 EST 2011


Don't forget the UK press (the first at any rate) was cut by Porky.  And I 
don't have to tell you what that means.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mike c" <insect.brain at GMAIL.COM>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.ISPNETINC.NET>
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: (OFF) Re: WOTEOT master tapes (was Re: Jamun & Spacerocktrading 
intro)


> Listening to a stone mint Atco.
> Just lacks a certain depth. Flatish percussion.
> Also, Atco pressings subject to pops and clicks inherent
> same with the test.
> and it's just real bright and csipy but not a big deal.
>
>
>
> On 3/10/11, mike c <insect.brain at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 3/10/11, Jamun <jason_gregory at talk21.com> wrote:
>>> I hazard a guess that your Warrior test press vinyl has been played less
>>> that your stock Atco vinyl. In which case it is quite possible, that
>>> after
>>> many plays, your stock Atco has had some of its high frequencies worn
>>> away
>>> from the vinyl. The high frequency content is one of the first things to
>>> go
>>> with repeated vinyl play. This could be a reason the test press sounds
>>> brighter.
>>>
>>
>> It's STONE and I mean STONE STONE STONE STONE mint, and I know where
>> it came from.
>> I have played it once years ago when I recorded it and I cannot recall
>> if I played it entirely through recently.
>> I have had trillions of Atco copies, including brand new, and they do
>> not sound like this.
>> Maybe a lower quality vinyl used for commercial pressings if not
>> beyond that alone.
>> Ihave just been told by a long time friend that he has parted BOC-L,
>> and until I hear I am not 97% to blame, I think I go back to bed.
>> sunlight
>> ARGHH
>>
> 



More information about the boc-l mailing list