[boc-l] ADMIN: Annoyance or interested?

[Jonathan Smith]

His messages go into the sapm folder do it does not bother me.

On 25 April 2016 at 21:01, Kenneth Ruch <kruch7 at cox.net> wrote:

> let him rant
>
>
> http://answersfromthewizard.com/
> http://ariochslair.com/
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Ben Cohen <ben at glaver.org> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Mr. Mumford is, once again, up to his old tricks of a seemingly endless
>> stream-of-consciousness set of rants. As I remarked to a friend (and the
>> owner
>> of the host servers), I'm not quite sure if it happens because he's
>> started up
>> on drugs or he's stopped taking them.
>>
>> In any event, I would like some input from the list community as a whole
>> - are
>> you comfortable with / welcoming of his on-going rants or shall I, once
>> again,
>> place him on moderated status (with, honestly, the expected result of my
>> probably not letting anything from him through).
>>
>> Please note: 1) this is going to the list as a whole, so he's seeing this
>> as
>> well; 2) feel free to respond either privately or publicly; 3) this truly
>> is
>> an honest request for input.
>>
>> There is, basically, nothing else that happens on this list, so I feel
>> like,
>> on the one hand, letting him rant on isn't necessarily "bad". On the other
>> hand, I'm pretty sure that this wasn't what most of you were looking for.
>>
>> And then, finally, on the gripping hand (look up "The Mote in God's Eye",
>> by
>> Larry Niven, for explanation), there's even the question of whether the
>> BOC-L
>> list should continue as a list at all. It certainly seems that, with
>> nothing
>> to discuss ... it might even be time to allow it to peacefully pass into
>> the
>> night.
>>
>> Please - consider the discussion now open.
>>
>> YnsHLM,
>> Ben
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ispnet.net/pipermail/boc-l/attachments/20160425/0a78f3a2/attachment-0001.html>