OFF: No Drugs & Hawkwind???

[Michael Blackman]

> you....but are you really suggesting that listening to HW is boring
without
> these additives?

where did that assumption come from?  :>|



to be stoned?
or not to be stoned?
........
what was the question myaaaaaan?

Michael B


----- Original Message -----
From: Melvyn Vincent <mel at MVA.U-NET.COM>
To: <BOC-L at LISTSERV.SPC.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: OFF: No Drugs & Hawkwind???


> Hi Darrin McKeehan
>
> Mmmm so you've been holding a proffesional position for the past 13yrs
> whilst regulary indulging in some mind altering substances. Thats fine for
> you....but are you really suggesting that listening to HW is boring
without
> these additives?
> Oh......and do you think that you can still function proffesionally in
your
> job without such substances (in your leisurtime I presume)?????
>
> I'm reminded by something Dave Brock once said.,.......along the lines
> of..............'Working with fellow musicians(who took drugs) in the
> band,was fine whilst they were stoned.But as soon as they were denied that
> stimulus,they became agitated and unreliable'.
> I assume from his comments that he no longer advocates the use of drugs
> within the band for the simple reason that individuals become too reliant
> on them,in order to function within the unit.
>
> Mel
>